Cited by 1,445Indigenous Studies and EcologyIndigenous Health, Education, and RightsEnvironmental and Cultural Studies in Latin America and Beyond

Using traditional ecological knowledge in science: methods and applications

Huntington, Henry P.·2000·Ecological Applications

Abstract

Advocates of Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK) have promoted its use in scientific research, impact assessment, and ecological understanding. While several examples illustrate the utility of applying TEK in these contexts, wider application of TEK‐derived information remains elusive. In part, this is due to continued inertia in favor of established scientific practices and the need to describe TEK in Western scientific terms. In part, it is also due to the difficulty of accessing TEK, which is rarely written down and must in most cases be documented as a project on its own prior to its incorporation into another scientific undertaking. This formidable practical obstacle is exacerbated by the need to use social science methods to gather biological data, so that TEK research and application becomes a multidisciplinary undertaking. By examining case studies involving bowhead whales, beluga whales, and herring, this paper describes some of the benefits of using TEK in scientific and management contexts. It also reviews some of the methods that are available to do so, including semi‐directive interviews, questionnaires, facilitated workshops, and collaborative field projects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[1270:utekis]2.0.co;2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huntington, H. P.
Corresponding author
Huntington, Henry P.
Venue
Ecological Applications
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-10
Volume
10
Issue
5
Pages
1270-1274
ISSN
1051-0761 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2153402033
Cited by
1,445
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 45 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 67 · 2021: 106 · 2020: 127 · 2019: 67 · 2018: 97 · 2017: 72 · 2016: 83 · 2015: 74 · 2014: 86 · 2013: 74 · 2012: 71
FWCI
15.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Ecological Applications (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Indigenous Studies and Ecology
  • Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Environmental and Cultural Studies in Latin America and Beyond
Keywords
traditional ecological knowledge, indigenous knowledge, knowledge integration, bowhead whale, beluga whale, herring, impact assessment, wildlife management, semi-directive interviews, facilitated workshops, social science methodology, traditional knowledge documentation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review