Using traditional ecological knowledge in science: methods and applications
Abstract
Advocates of Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK) have promoted its use in scientific research, impact assessment, and ecological understanding. While several examples illustrate the utility of applying TEK in these contexts, wider application of TEK‐derived information remains elusive. In part, this is due to continued inertia in favor of established scientific practices and the need to describe TEK in Western scientific terms. In part, it is also due to the difficulty of accessing TEK, which is rarely written down and must in most cases be documented as a project on its own prior to its incorporation into another scientific undertaking. This formidable practical obstacle is exacerbated by the need to use social science methods to gather biological data, so that TEK research and application becomes a multidisciplinary undertaking. By examining case studies involving bowhead whales, beluga whales, and herring, this paper describes some of the benefits of using TEK in scientific and management contexts. It also reviews some of the methods that are available to do so, including semi‐directive interviews, questionnaires, facilitated workshops, and collaborative field projects.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
These techniques validated Indigenous understanding and led to much higher population estimates.
“These techniques validated Indigenous understanding -and led to much higher population estimates (Albert, 2001;Huntington, 2000).”
From Institutional navigation of oceans governance: Lessons from Russia and the United States Indigenous multi-level whaling governance in the Arctic (2022) · cites this paper as Huntington, 2000
Climate adaptation can be enhanced by traditional knowledge of wildlife movements and concentrations, for which tribal hunters have considerable knowledge.
“Climate adaptation can be enhanced by traditional knowledge of wildlife movements and concentrations, for which tribal hunters have considerable knowledge (Huntington 2000).”
From Culture, law, risk and governance: contexts of traditional knowledge in climate change adaptation (2013) · cites this paper as Huntington 2000
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Castello, L., Viana, J. P., Watkins, G., Pinedo-Vasquez, M., & Luzadis, V. A. (2009) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/s00267-008-9220-5 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Culture, law, risk and governance: contexts of traditional knowledge in climate change adaptation
Williams, T., & Hardison, P. (2013) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0850-0 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Mantyka-Pringle, C. S., Jardine, T. D., Bradford, L., Bharadwaj, L., Kythreotis, A. P., Fresque-Baxter, J., Kelly, E., Somers, G., Doig, L. E., Jones, P. D., et al. (2017) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2017.02.008 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Engaging Southwestern Tribes in Sustainable Water Resources Topics and Management
Chief, K., Meadow, A., & Whyte, K. (2016) · Water · doi:10.3390/w8080350 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Esselman, P. C., & Opperman, J. J. (2010) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-03058-150106 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Culture, law, risk and governance: contexts of traditional knowledge in climate change adaptation
Williams, T., & Hardison, P. (2013) · Climate Change and Indigenous Peoples in the United States · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-05266-3_3 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Using Indigenous and Western knowledge systems for environmental risk assessment
Buell, M.-C., Ritchie, D., Ryan, K., & Metcalfe, C. D. (2020) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1002/eap.2146 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Louah, L., Visser, M., Baltazar, S., & Delobel, V. (2015) · Pour · doi:10.3917/pour.226.0005 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
York, A. M., Zdor, E., BurnSilver, S., Degai, T., Monakhova, M., Isakova, S., Petrov, A. N., & Kempf, M. (2022) · Earth System Governance · doi:10.1016/j.esg.2022.100154 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Huntington, H. P.
- Corresponding author
- Huntington, Henry P.
- ORCID
- Huntington, Henry P.
- Venue
- Ecological Applications
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-10
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1270-1274
- ISSN
- 1051-0761 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2153402033
- Cited by
- 1,445
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 45 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 67 · 2021: 106 · 2020: 127 · 2019: 67 · 2018: 97 · 2017: 72 · 2016: 83 · 2015: 74 · 2014: 86 · 2013: 74 · 2012: 71
- FWCI
- 15.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Ecological Applications (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Indigenous Studies and Ecology
- Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Environmental and Cultural Studies in Latin America and Beyond
- Keywords
- traditional ecological knowledge, indigenous knowledge, knowledge integration, bowhead whale, beluga whale, herring, impact assessment, wildlife management, semi-directive interviews, facilitated workshops, social science methodology, traditional knowledge documentation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review